Astronomy Report
Recent News |  Archives |  Tags |  About |  Newsletter |  Submit News |  Links |  Subscribe to AstronomyReport.com RSS Feed Subscribe
New Articles
Intense heat killed the Universe's would-be galaxies, researchers say 7/2/2009

Largest ever survey of very distant galaxy clusters completed 7/1/2009

New instrument has potential to detect water deep underground on Mars 6/30/2009

Salty ocean in the depths of Enceladus 6/30/2009

Galaxies coming of age in cosmic blobs 6/29/2009

Jets on Saturn's moon Enceladus not geysers from underground ocean, says study 6/28/2009

Milky Way's super-efficient particle accelerators caught in the act 6/28/2009

Better looks at Mars minerals for instrument on NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter 6/27/2009

NASA lunar mission successfully enters moon orbit 6/26/2009

Magnetic field on bright star Vega 6/25/2009

Team finds definitive evidence for ancient lake on Mars 6/24/2009

Newly revised handbook of space technology now available 6/23/2009

Astronomy team among first to use massive new telescope 6/22/2009

Magnetospheric Multiscale mission enters implementation phase 6/22/2009

Herschel's daring test: A glimpse of things to come 6/22/2009

Evidence of massive asteroid impact on Mars supported by computer simulations (6/27/2008)

Tags:
mars, asteroids, impact craters, planets

 The northern hemisphere of Mars is low (blue) and smooth, while the southern hemisphere is high (red) and heavily cratered. Image courtesy of NASA.
The northern hemisphere of Mars is low (blue) and smooth, while the southern hemisphere is high (red) and heavily cratered. Image courtesy of NASA.
The dramatic differences between the northern and southern hemispheres of Mars have puzzled scientists for 30 years. One of the proposed explanations--a massive asteroid impact--now has strong support from computer simulations carried out by two groups of researchers. Planetary scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz, were involved in both studies, which appear in the June 26 issue of Nature.

"It's a very old idea, but nobody had done the numerical calculations to see what would happen when a big asteroid hits Mars," said Francis Nimmo, associate professor of Earth and planetary sciences at UCSC and first author of one of the papers.

Nimmo's group found that such an impact could indeed produce the observed differences between the Martian hemispheres. The other study used a different approach and reached the same conclusion. Nimmo's paper also suggests testable predictions about the consequences of the impact.

The so-called hemispheric dichotomy was first observed by NASA's Viking missions to Mars in the 1970s. The Viking spacecraft revealed that the two halves of the planet look very different, with relatively young, low-lying plains in the north and relatively old, cratered highlands in the south. Some 20 years later, the Mars Global Surveyor mission showed that the crust of the planet is much thicker in the south and also revealed magnetic anomalies present in the southern hemisphere and not in the north.

"Two main explanations have been proposed for the hemispheric dichotomy--either some kind of internal process that changed one half of the planet, or a big impact hitting one side of it," Nimmo said. "The impact would have to be big enough to blast the crust off half of the planet, but not so big that it melts everything. We showed that you really can form the dichotomy that way."

Nimmo's group includes UCSC graduate student Shawn Hart, associate researcher Don Korycansky, and Craig Agnor of Queen Mary University, London. The other paper is by Margarita Marinova and Oded Aharonson of the California Institute of Technology and Erik Asphaug, professor of Earth and planetary sciences at UCSC.

 This image from a computer simulation shows the type of impact that could have created the Mars hemispheric dichotomy. Credit: M. Marinova, O. Aharonson, E. Asphaug.
This image from a computer simulation shows the type of impact that could have created the Mars hemispheric dichotomy. Credit: M. Marinova, O. Aharonson, E. Asphaug.
The quantitative model used by Nimmo's group calculated the effects of an impact in two dimensions. Asphaug's group used a different model to calculate impacts in three dimensions, but with lower resolution (i.e., less detail in the simulation).

"The two approaches are very complementary; putting them together gives you a complete picture," Nimmo said. "The two-dimensional model provides high resolution, but you can only look at vertical impacts. The three-dimensional model allows nonvertical impacts, but the resolution is lower so you can't track what happens to the crust."

Most planetary impacts are not head-on, Asphaug said. His group found a "sweet spot" of impact conditions that result in a hemispheric dichotomy matching the observations. Those conditions include an impactor about one-half to two-thirds the size of the Moon, striking at an angle of 30 to 60 degrees.

"This is how planets finish their business of formation," Asphaug said. "They collide with other bodies of comparable size in gargantuan collisions. The last of those big collisions defines the planet."

According to Nimmo's analysis, shock waves from the impact would travel through the planet and disrupt the crust on the other side, causing changes in the magnetic field recorded there. The predicted changes are consistent with observations of magnetic anomalies in the southern hemisphere, he said.

In addition, new crust that formed in the northern lowlands would be derived from deep mantle rock melted by the impact and should have significantly different characteristics from the southern hemisphere crust. Certain Martian meteorites may have originated from the northern crust, Nimmo said. The study also suggests that the impact occurred around the same time as the impact on Earth that created the Moon.

This research was funded by NASA.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the UC Santa Cruz

Comments:

1. Recruitment Oursourcing

6/27/2008 2:05:15 PM MST

Great article. I love reading about space, the different planets and especially if there will ever be life on another planet besides earth. I wonder if people will ever be able to relocate to Mars.


Leave a Reply:

Search


Archives
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007


Science Friends
Agricultural Science
Biology News
Biomimicry Science
Cognitive Research
Chemistry News
Tissue Engineering
Cancer Research
Cybernetics Research
Fossil News
Genetic Archaeology
Genetics News
Geology News
Nanotech News
Physics News
  Archives |  Submit News |  Advertise With Us |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2010 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.